Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 03 Mar 2011

Geopolitics from Above: A Review of U.S.-Turkey Bilateral Relations, 1947-2006

,
, and
Page Range: 1 – 17
DOI: 10.5555/arwg.11.1-2.qt8w872527307414
Save
Download PDF

This paper analyzes geopolitical changes and continuity in bilateral relations between Turkey and the United States from the Truman Doctrine in 1947 to the present. While the relationship was referred to as an “alliance” during the Cold War, established with a common interest in containing the Soviet Union, the post-Cold War era posed important challenges and transformed the relationship into a “strategic partnership” The post-September 11 era has put the viability of the strategic partnership under scrutiny: relations between the two countries have been going through a crisis, especially under the impact of the United States' war on Iraq from March 2003 on. Bilateral U.S.—Turkish relations in this era have evolved from a “strategic partnership” to a “partnership for democracy and war on terrorism” in the greater Middle East.

Ce travail analyse les changements et les continuités géopolitiques affectant les relations unilatérales entre la Turquie et les états-Unis de la Doctrine Truman énoncée en 1947 jusqu'à l'heure actuelle. Alors que la relation entre ces deux pays avait été présentée comme une « alliance » durant la Guerre froide reposant sur l'intérêt commun de contenir l'Union soviétique, la période de l'après-guerre froide a posé une série de défis et a transformé la relation en un « partenariat stratégique ». La période de l'après-11 septembre a remis en question la viabilité d'un tel partenariat stratégique : les relations entre les deux pays ont traversé une crise, notamment après mars 2003, à la suite de l'impact de la guerre américaine en Irak. Les relations bilatérales turco-américaines ont évolué pendant cette période d'un « partenariat stratégique » vers un « partenariat pour la démocratie et la guerre contre le terrorisme » dans le Grand Moyen-Orient.

Agnew, J. 1993. The United States and American hegemony. In Political geography of the twentieth century: A global analysis, ed. P. Taylor, 207-238. London: Belhaven Press.

Agnew, J. 2003. Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics. London; New York: Routledge.

Altunisik, M. 2000. The Turkish-Israeli rapprochement in the Post-Cold War era. Middle Eastern Studies 36:172-91.

Bahceli, T. 1994. Turkey, the Gulf Crisis, and the New World Order. In The Gulf War and the new world order: International relations of the Middle East, eds. T. J. Ismael and J. S. Ismael, 435-447. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

Baran, Z. 2003. Turkish-American strategic partnership on the brink: Who is to blame? The National Interest 2(17). http://inthenationalinterest.com/Articles/Vol2Issue17/vol2issue17Baran.html http://inthenationalinterest.com/Articles/Vol2Issue17/vol2issue17Baran.html

Campany, R. C. 1986. Turkey and the United States: The arms embargo period. New York: Praeger.

Cohen, S. 1973. Geography and politics in a world divided. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, S. 1999. Geopolitics in the New World Era: A new perspective on an old discipline. In Reordering the world: Geopolitical perspectives on the twenty-first century, ed. G. Demko and W. Wood, 40-68. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Cohen, S. 2004. The geopolitics of Turkey's accession to the European Union. Eurasian Geography and Economics 45:575-82.

Cohen, S. 2005. The Eurasian convergence zone: Gateway or shatterbelt? Eurasian Geography and Economics 46:1-22.

Dodds, K. 2003. Licensed to stereotype: Popular geopolitics, James Bond and the spectre of balkanism. Geopolitics 8(2):125-156.

Drysdale, A., and Blake, G. 1985. The Middle East and North Africa: A political geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Erickson, E. 2004. Turkey as regional hegemon—2014: Strategic implications for the United States. Turkish Studies 5(3):25-45.

Falah, G. 1993. Demography and division: A view from the Middle East. In Political geography of the twentieth century: A global analysis, ed. P. Taylor, 245-251. London: Belhaven Press.

Folliot, D. (ed.). 1954. Documents on International Affairs, 1951. London: Oxford University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Holsti, K. J. 1967. International politics: A framework for analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Johnston, R., Taylor, P., and Watts, M. 2001. Geographies of global change: Remapping the world. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.

Kennan, G. 1947. The sources of Soviet conduct. Foreign Affairs 25:566-582.

Kinzer, S. 2001. Turkey's place in the war against militant Islam. The Middle East Forum, 17 October. http://www.meforum.org/95/turkeys-placein-the-war-against-militant-islam http://www.meforum.org/95/turkeys-placein-the-war-against-militant-islam

Kirisçi, K. 2000. Turk-Amerikan Iliskileri: Belirsizlikten Yakinlasmaya. Avrasya Dosyasi 6(2):68-90.

Kirisçi, K. 2001. Turkey and the United States: Ambivalent allies. Middle East Review of International Affairs 2(4). http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/1998/issue4/jv2n4a3.html. http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/1998/issue4/jv2n4a3.html

Lenczowski, L. 1979. The arc of crisis: Its central sector. Foreign Affairs 57:796-820.

Mackinder, H. 1904. The geographical pivot of history. Geographical Journal 23:421-437.

Mackinder, H. 1919. Democratic ideals and reality: A study in the politics of reconstruction. London: Constable and Company.

O'Loughlin, J. 1989. World power competition and local conflicts in the Third World. In A world in crisis? Geopolitical perspectives, ed. R.J. Johnston and P. Taylor, 289-332. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ó Tuathail, G. 1996. Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Pipes, D. 2003. Turkiye-AKP: Bekleyelim Gorelim. Radikal, 11 August.

The Project for the New American Century [PNAC]. 2000. Rebuilding America's defenses: Strategy, forces and resources for a new century. Washington, D.C.: PNAC. http://newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf. http://newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Sander, O. 2000. Siyasi Tarih: lk Ca lardan 1918'e. Ankara: mge Kitapevi.

Spykman, N. 1942. America's strategy in world politics: The United States and the balance of power. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.

Spykman, N. 1944. The geography of the peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.

Truman, H. S. 1947. The Truman Doctrine. Archived at the Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy. New Haven, CT: Yale Law School. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/trudoc.asp http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/trudoc.asp

Uslu, N. 2000. 1947'den günümüze Türk-Amerikan ili kilerinin genel portresi. Avrasya Dosyasi 6(2): 204.

Yavuz, H. 1998. Turkish identity and foreign policy in flux: The rise of neo-Ottomanism. Journal for Critical Studies of the Middle East 12:19-41.

Zanger, M. 2002. The US and the Kurds of Iraq. Middle East Research and Information Project, 9 August. http://merip.org/mero//mero080902.html http://merip.org/mero//mero080902.html

  • Download PDF