Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 24 Feb 2011

Willingness to Pay in Kinabalu Park, Malasia: A Portrayal of the Meanings of Kinabalu

,
, and
Page Range: 126 – 137
DOI: 10.5555/arwg.13.2.920227818qlj433j
Save
Download PDF

The central question addressed in this paper is whether tourists visiting a protected area are willing to pay more and what are the reasons behind such motives, so as to enhance tourism revenue in protected areas. Studies have concluded that most parks are charging fees far below what visitors are willing to pay, and thus suggest that parks charges for entrance, activities, and facilities should be increased accordingly to conform to the user-pay scheme. It has been widely recognized that reasons for willingness to pay more differ from one individual or group from another, and that the most noticeable factors are related to the various perceptions held by an individual/group of what a protected area should be and what it offers, as well as the roles it plays. These perceptions are captured within the nexus of visitor backgrounds. For the purposes of this paper, the authors focus on foreign visitors. How pre-existing perceptions of a protected area “is supposed to be” influence willingness to pay among foreign visitors to protected areas is discussed by reference to the case of Kinabalu Park in Malaysia.

Les questions centrales posées par cet article traitent de la disposition des touristes à payer plus pour visiter une région protégée ainsi que les raisons derrière leurs motifs, de manière à pouvoir augmenter les revenus touristiques dans ces espaces. Des études ont conclu que la plupart des parcs exigent un prix d'entrée bien inférieur à ce que les visiteurs sont prêts à payer et suggèrent alors que les prix soient augmentés de manière à correspondre au coût réel du service. Il est admis que les raisons qui mènent les individus et les groupes à payer plus diffèrent ; les variables explicatives sont liées aux différentes perceptions qu'ils ont de ce qu'une région protégée devrait être et offrir, et les rôles qu'elle devrait jouer. Ces perceptions sont en relation avec des histoires individuelles des visiteurs. Pour cet article, l'auteur s'appuie sur le cas des visiteurs étrangers du Parc Kinabalu en Malaisie pour saisir l'influence du facteur de la perception préexistante sur la disposition à payer.

Africa Finance and Private Sector Development [AFTPS]. 2002. Republic of Madagascar: Tourism sector study. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Aiken, S. R. 2002. Penang Hill: Landscape evolution, heritage conservation, and sustainable tourism. Malaysian Journal of Tropical Geography 33(1/2):77-92.

Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council [ANZECC]. 2000. Benchmarking and best practice program: User-pays revenue (updated from a report originally published in September 1996). http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/publications/best-practice/pubs/user-pays.pdf http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/publications/best-practice/pubs/user-pays.pdf

Arnold, J. H. 2000. History: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Backhaus, N. 2005. Tourism and nature conservation in Malaysian national parks. Muenster: LIT.

Barthlott, W., Lauer, W., and Plancke, A. 1996. Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants: Towards a world map of phytodiversity. Erdkunde 50:317-27.

Beaman, J. H., and Anderson, C. 2004. The plants of Mount Kinabalu, 5: Dicotyledon families Magnoliaceae to Winteraceae. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo) / Kew, U.K.: Royal Botanic Gardens.

Beaman, J. H., and Beaman, R. S. 1998. The plants of Mount Kinabalu, 3: Gymnosperms and nonorchid monocotyledons. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo) / Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

Beaman, J. H., Anderson, C. and Beaman, R. S. 2001. The Plants of Mount Kinabalu 4. Dicotyledon Families Acanthaceae to Lythraceae. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo) / Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

Bruno Manser Fonds. 2009. Penan sue Sarawak government over logging, plantations. Bruno Manser Fonds, 10 December. http://www.bmf.ch/en/news/?show=185 http://www.bmf.ch/en/news/?show=185

Bull, A. 1995. The economics of travel and tourism, 2nd ed. Melbourne: Longman.

Eagles, P. F. J., and McCool, S. F. 2002. Tourism in national parks and protected areas: Planning and management. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing.

Font, X., Cochrane, J., and Tapper, R. 2004. Tourism for protected area financing: Understanding tourism revenues for effective management plans (report submitted to the World Wildlife Fund). Leeds, U.K.: Leeds Metropolitan University.

Foreman, D. 1991. Confessions of an ecowarrior. New York: Crown Publishing.

Goh, H. C. 2008. Sustainable tourism and the influence of privatization on the management in protected area management: A case of Kinabalu Park. Bonn: ZEF.

Gomerz-Pompa, A., and Kaus, A. 1992. Taming the wilderness myth. BioScience 42:271-79.

Government of Malaysia. 2006. Rancangan Malaysia ke-Sembilan. Putrajaya: Unit Perancangan Ekonomi Jabatan Perdana Menteri.

Hall, C. M., and McArthur, S. 1998. Integrated heritage management. Norwich, UK: HMSO.

Harper, P. 1997. The importance of community involvement in sustainable tourism development. In Tourism and sustainability: Principles and practice, ed. M. J. Stabler, 143-49. Oxford: CAB International.

International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN]. 2005. Benefits beyond boundaries: Recommendations. Proceedings of the Fifth IUCN World Parks Congress, Glad, Switzerland, 139-218. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/recommendationen.pdf http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/recommendationen.pdf

IUCN-WCPA. 1995. Previous world parks congresses. http://www.environment.gov.za/Documents /Documents/2003Aug27/previous_wpc_27082003.html http://www.environment.gov.za/Documents /Documents/2003Aug27/previous_wpc_27082003.html

IUCN-WCPA. 2004. The IUCN management categories: Speaking a common language about protected areas. Paper presented at the seventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP7), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 9-20 February.

Jacobson, S. K., and Robles, R. 1992. Ecotourism, sustainable development and conservation education: Development of a tour guide training program in Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Environmental Management 16:701-13.

James, A., Green, M., and Paine, J. 1999. A global review of protected area budgets and staffing. Cambridge: World Conservation Monitoring Center.

Juvik, S. P. 1993. Christian denominational influences on attitudes toward resources development: Marovo Lagoon, Solomon Islands. In Ethics, religion and biodiversity: Relations between conservation and cultural values, ed. L. S. Hamilton, 147-75. Cambridge: White Horse Press.

Komoo, I. 1997. Glacial geomorphology of Kinabalu Plateau. In Warisan geologi Malaysia: Geologi pemuliharaan untuk ekopelancongan, ed. D. Zainudin, 299-319. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Leete, R. 2008. Sabah's human development progress and challenges. Kuala Lumpur: United Nations Development Programme. http://www.undp.org.my/uploads/SabahHumanDevp.pdf http://www.undp.org.my/uploads/SabahHumanDevp.pdf

Lindberg, K., and Aylward, B. 1999. Price responsiveness in the developing country nature tourism context: Review and Costa Rican case study. Journal of Leisure Research 31:281-99.

Lindberg, K., and Enriquez, J. 1994. Summary report: An analysis of ecotourism's contribution to conservation and development in Belize, vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: World Wildlife Fund.

Lowenthal, D. 1998. The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maffi, L. 2005. Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:599-617.

Maiero, M., and Shen, X. M. 2004. Commonalities between cultural and biodiversity. Unpublished term paper, Center fo Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn.

Malaysia Department of Statistics. 2005. State/district data bank. Putrajaya: Malaysia Department of Statistics.

Manes, C. 1991. Green rage: Radical environmentalism and the unmaking of civilization. Boston: Back Bay Books.

Martin, G., Agama, A. L., Beaman, J. H., and Nais, J. 2002. Projek Ethnobotani Kinabalu: The making of a Dusun ethnoflora (Sabah, Malaysia) (People and Plants Working Paper No. 9). Paris: UNESCO.

More, T., and Stevens, T. 2000. Do user fees exclude low-income people from resource-based recreation? Journal of Leisure Research 32:341-57.

Nais, J. 1996. Kinabalu Park and the surrounding indigenous communities South-South cooperation Programme on Environmentally Sound Socio-economic Development in the Humid Tropics Working Paper No. 17). Paris: UNESCO.

Peters, H., and Hawkins, J. P. 2009. Access to marine parks: A comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean and Coastal Management 52:219-28.

Phillipps, A., and Liew, F. 2000. Globetrotter visitor's guide: Kinabalu Park, Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. London: New Holland Publishers.

Regis, P. 1996. The people and folklore of Kinabalu. In Kinabalu: Summit of Borneo, ed. K. M. Wong and A. Phillipps, 31-39. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Society / Sabah Parks.

Reynisdottir, M., Song, H., and Agrusa, J. 2008. Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management 29:1076-83.

Rodman, J. 1983. Four forms of ecological consciousness reconsidered. In Environmental ethics, ed. D. Scherer and T. Attig, 82-92. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Rolston, H. 2000. Restoration. In Environmental restoration: Ethics, theory and practice, ed. W. Throops, 127-32. Amherst, New York: Humanity Books.

Rueegge, B. 2003. Borneo im Mediendiskurs. Zurich: Universität Zürich.

Sabah Parks. 1998. Kinabalu Park: A world heritage site? (Unpublished proposal submitted to the Sabah State Cabinet). Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Parks.

Schroeder, H. W., and Louviere, J. 1999. Stated choice models for predicting the impact of user fees at public recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research 31:300-324.

Sharma, U. R. 1990. An overview of park- people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning 19:133-44.

Sishu Wujing (Four Books and Five Classics/). 1991. Changsha : Yuelu Publishing House . 1991. .

Stevens, T. 2002. Sustainable tourism in national parks: An overview. Swansea: Scottish Natural Heritage / Stevens and Associates.

Tuboh, L., Sipail, E., and Gosungkit, Z. 1999. A case study of the Kadazandusun communities in the Crocker Range National Park, Sabah, Malaysia. In Indigenous peoples and protected areas in South and Southeast Asia: From principles to practice, ed. M. Colchester and C. Erni, 206-19. Copenhagen: International Workgroup for Indigenous Peoples' Affairs.

UNESCO World Heritage Centre [WHC]. 2006. New sites to be inscribed on UNESCO World Heritage List (News release, 30 June). http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/132 http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/132

UNESCO World Heritage Centre [WHC]. 2007. Kinabalu Park. World Heritage List. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1012 http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1012

UNESCO World Heritage Centre [WHC]. 2009. World heritage. http://whc.unesco.org/en/about/ http://whc.unesco.org/en/about/

van der Stoep, G. A. 2000. Community tourism development. In Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure and tourism, ed. W. C. Gartner and D. W. Lime, 309-21. Oxford: CABI Publishing.

Vorlaufer, K. 1996. Tourismus in Entwicklungslaendern: Moeglichkeiten und Grenzen einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung durch Fremdenverkehr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

White, L. T., Jr. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155:1203-7.

Wong, K. M., and Phillipps, A., eds. 1996. Kinabalu: Summit of Borneo, rev. ed. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Society / Sabah Parks.

Wood, J. J., Beaman, R. S., and Beaman, J. H. 1993. The plants of Mt Kinabalu, vol. 2: Orchids. Kew, U.K.: Royal Botanic Gardens.

World Wildlife Fund [WWF] UK. 1992. Beyond the green horizon: Principles for sustainable tourism. Surrey: WWF UK.

  • Download PDF