Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 06 Dec 2012

Fertility Differential by Education and Religion in Dhanbad District, Jharkhand (India)

and
Page Range: 226 – 242
DOI: 10.5555/arwg.15.3.42374833382p5t01
Save
Download PDF

The study of fertility differentials is of special significance for economic development and national planning. Differentials in fertility by education and religion have long been studied by demographers, geographers, planners, and other scientists; significant differences in fertility by both these parameters have been observed in India. This study is empirically examines differentials in fertility by religion and education in Dhanbad district, Jharkhand, based on primary data collected through a household survey. Mean children ever born (MCEB) is used as a measure to determine fertility rates of women by educational status and religion (Hindu vs. Muslim). Maps are drawn, using both current and cumulative fertility measures, to highlight spatial patterns of fertility. Findings show that Muslims have higher fertility than Hindus, but at higher educational status, the difference narrows considerably. Thus, education seems to have a homogenizing effect, reducing the Hindu-Muslim fertility gap.

L’étude des différences du taux de fécondité est particulièrement importante pour le développement économique et la planification nationale. Les démographes, les géographes, les aménageurs et autres chercheurs étudient depuis longtemps ces différences en fonction du niveau de l’éducation et de la religion en Inde. Cette étude examine empiriquement les différences de fécondité en fonction du niveau d’éducation et de la religion dans le district de Dhanbad dans l’État de Jharkhand, à partir de données produites lors d’une enquête auprès de ménages. La moyenne des enfants effectivement nés a été utilisée pour déterminer les taux de fécondité des femmes par niveau d’éducation des enquêtées et selon leur religion (hindoue ou musulmane). La fécondité actuelle et cumulée ont été cartographiées pour montrer leur distribution; les résultats montrent que les musulmanes ont des taux de fécondité supérieurs aux hindoues, mais l’écart se réduit considérablement si les enquêtées ont un niveau d’éducation supérieur. Il semblerait donc que l’éducation ait un effet d’homogénéisation en réduisant l’écart de fécondité entre ces deux catégories.

Arokiasamy, P., McNay, K., and Cassen, R. H. 2004. Female education and fertility decline: Recent developments in the relationship. Economic and Political Weekly 39(41):4503-7.

Bhasin, V., and Bhasin, M.K. 2000. Fertility differentials: A study on the Buddhists and the Hindus in Sikkim, India. International Journal of Anthropology 15(1-2):59-79.

Bollen, K. A., Glanville, J. L., and Stecklov, G. 2007. Socio-economic status, permanent income, and fertility: A latent variable approach. Population Studies 61(1):15-34.

Bongaarts, J. A. 1978. Framework for analysis for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review 4(1):105-132.

Breierova, L. and Duflo, E. 2004. The impact of education on fertility and child mortality: Do fathers really matter less than mothers? OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/325632465160

Chandna, R. C. 1984. Geography of population: Concepts, determinants and patterns. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers.

Census of India. 2001. http://www.censusofindia.com http://www.censusofindia.com

Ewer, P. A., and Crimmins-Gardner, E. 1978. Income in the income fertility relationship. Journal of Marriage and Family 40(2):291-99.

Garnier, J. B. 1983. Geography of population, 2nd ed. London: Longman.

Goldscheider, C. 1971. Population, modernization, and social structure. Boston: Little, Brown.

Government of India. 2006. Social, economic and educational status of Muslim community of India: A report. Prime Minister High Level Committee, Cabinet Secretariat.

Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2007. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: Key findings. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences.

Hoem, J. M.,Neyer, G., and Andersson, G. 2006. Educational attainment and ultimate fertility among Swedish women born in 1955-59. Demographic Research 14:381-404.

Jeffery, R., and Jeffery, P. 2000. Religion and fertility in India. Economic and Political Weekly 35(35/36):3253-59.

Kaur, H. 2000. Impact of income and education on fertility. Journal of Family Welfare 46(1):70-76.

Kravdal, O. 2002. Education and fertility in Sub Saharan Africa: Individual and community effects. Demography 39(2):233-50.

McNicoll, G. 1980. Institutional determinants of fertility change. Population and Development Review 6(3):441-62.

McQuillan, K. 2004.When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review 30(1):25-36.

Moulasha, K., and Rao, G. R. 1999. Religion-specific differentials in fertility and family planning. Economic and Political Weekly 34(42/43):3047-51.

Regassa, N. 2007. Socio-economic Correlates of high fertility among low contraceptive communities in southern Ethiopia. Journal of Human Ecology 46(3):203-13.

Rele, J. R. 1963. Fertility differentials in India: Evidence from rural background. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 41(2):183-99.

Robinson, W. C., and Kanter, J. F. 1988. The impact of development programmes on fertility: A framework for analysis. Asia Pacific Population Journal 3(3):65-80.

Saxena, P.C., and Jurdi, R. N.d. Impact of proximate determinants on the recent fertility transition in Yemen. UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. http://www.escwa.un.org/popin/publications/new/prem.doc http://www.escwa.un.org/popin/publications/new/prem.doc

Unisa, S., and Bhagat, R. B. 2000. Social dimensions of fertility in India: Insights from a regional study. International Journal of Anthropology 15(1-2):81-90.

Young, P. V. 2003. Scientific social survey and research, 4th ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.

  • Download PDF